[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9CD4A1A7-E378-49A5-85F8-4566B019231A@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 08:49:42 -0400
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, willy@...radead.org, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
djwong@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, john.g.garry@...cle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hare@...e.de, p.raghav@...sung.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com,
cl@...amperecomputing.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks
On 9 Jul 2024, at 7:04, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
>>
>> This should be
>>
>> if (!folio->mapping) {
>> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
>> count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> Otherwise, a non PMD mappable folio with no mapping will fall through
>> and cause NULL pointer dereference in mapping_min_folio_order().
>
> Ah, of course. I thought I was being "smart" here to avoid another
> nesting. Instead of triple nested ifs, I guess this is better:
>
> int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
> {
> unsigned int min_order = 0;
>
> if (folio_test_anon(folio))
> goto out;
>
> if (!folio->mapping) {
> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
> out:
> return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list,
> min_order);
> }
>
> Let me know what you think!
LGTM. Thanks. With this change, feel free to add Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists