[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b313d570-e3f3-479f-a469-ba2759313ea4@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:16:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfr@...look.com, rock.xu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/7] net: stmmac: xgmac: drop incomplete FPE
implementation
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:21:19PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> The FPE support for xgmac is incomplete, drop it temporarily.
> Once FPE implementation is refactored, xgmac support will be added.
This is a pretty unusual thing to do. What does the current
implementation do? Is there enough for it to actually work? If i was
doing a git bisect and landed on this patch, could i find my
networking is broken?
More normal is to build a new implementation by the side, and then
swap to it.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists