lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b313d570-e3f3-479f-a469-ba2759313ea4@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:16:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xfr@...look.com, rock.xu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/7] net: stmmac: xgmac: drop incomplete FPE
 implementation

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:21:19PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> The FPE support for xgmac is incomplete, drop it temporarily.
> Once FPE implementation is refactored, xgmac support will be added.

This is a pretty unusual thing to do. What does the current
implementation do? Is there enough for it to actually work? If i was
doing a git bisect and landed on this patch, could i find my
networking is broken?

More normal is to build a new implementation by the side, and then
swap to it.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ