linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO dummy return thunk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALMp9eQ4kO_x_eS_ehLQKrvn+9cfh6b_WNcgaNj1jfakh4e8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:21:41 -0700
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10] x86/retpoline: Move a NOENDBR annotation to the SRSO
 dummy return thunk

On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 4:11 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 07:15:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Sending fixups like this, for things that are already committed are
> > fine.  But note, someone needs to at least send them to the right place
> > (i.e. no one cc:ed stable@...r.kernel.org...) if they wish to see them
> > applied to a stable kernel...
>
> Jim, should I or you want?

Done.

> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette