lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39591663-9151-42f9-9906-4684acaa685c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:09:27 +0200
From: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@...il.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, Kees Cook
 <kees@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
 Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
 reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PROBLEM linux-next] fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c:1147:13: error: variable ‘leaf_mi’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]

Dear all,

On the linux-next vanilla next-20240709 tree, I have attempted the seed KCONFIG_SEED=0xEE7AB52F
which was known from before to trigger various errors in compile and build process.

Though this might seem as contributing to channel noise, Linux refuses to build this config,
treating warnings as errors, using this build line:

$ time nice make W=1 -k -j 36 |& tee ../err-next-20230709-01a.log; date

As I know that the Chief Penguin doesn't like warnings, but I am also aware that there are plenty
left, there seems to be more tedious work ahead to make the compilers happy.

The compiler output is:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c: In function ‘balance_leaf_new_nodes_paste_whole’:
fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c:1147:13: error: variable ‘leaf_mi’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
 1147 |         int leaf_mi;
      |             ^~~~~~~
  CC      fs/reiserfs/lbalance.o
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c: In function ‘dc_check_balance_leaf’:
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1938:13: error: variable ‘maxsize’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
 1938 |         int maxsize, ret;
      |             ^~~~~~~
fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1935:13: error: variable ‘levbytes’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
 1935 |         int levbytes;
      |             ^~~~~~~~
fs/reiserfs/prints.c: In function ‘prepare_error_buf’:
fs/reiserfs/prints.c:221:17: error: function ‘prepare_error_buf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
  221 |                 p += vscnprintf(p, end - p, fmt1, args);
      |                 ^
fs/reiserfs/prints.c:260:9: error: function ‘prepare_error_buf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
  260 |         p += vscnprintf(p, end - p, fmt1, args);
      |         ^
make[4]: Target 'arch/x86/kernel/' not remade because of errors.
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
make[3]: Target 'arch/x86/' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:485: arch/x86] Error 2
fs/reiserfs/lbalance.c: In function ‘leaf_copy_items’:
fs/reiserfs/lbalance.c:524:29: error: variable ‘dest’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
  524 |         struct buffer_head *dest;
      |                             ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: fs/reiserfs/do_balan.o] Error 1
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: fs/reiserfs/prints.o] Error 1
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: fs/reiserfs/fix_node.o] Error 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1938:13, fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:1935:13, and fs/reiserfs/lbalance.c:524:29,
the problem seem to lie within the construct RFALSE(), like

 521 static int leaf_copy_items(struct buffer_info *dest_bi, struct buffer_head *src,
 522                            int last_first, int cpy_num, int cpy_bytes)
 523 {
 524         struct buffer_head *dest;
 525         int pos, i, src_nr_item, bytes;
 526 
 527         dest = dest_bi->bi_bh;
 528         RFALSE(!dest || !src, "vs-10210: !dest || !src");
 529         RFALSE(last_first != FIRST_TO_LAST && last_first != LAST_TO_FIRST,
 530                "vs-10220:last_first != FIRST_TO_LAST && last_first != LAST_TO_FIRST");
 531         RFALSE(B_NR_ITEMS(src) < cpy_num,
 532                "vs-10230: No enough items: %d, req. %d", B_NR_ITEMS(src),
 533                cpy_num);
 534         RFALSE(cpy_num < 0, "vs-10240: cpy_num < 0 (%d)", cpy_num);

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Mirsad Todorovac

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ