[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240710191824.GD9228@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 21:18:24 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tandersen@...flix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Julian Orth <ju.orth@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kernel: rerun task_work while freezing in
get_signal()
I have already acked this patch, so I am sorry for the noise, but
On 07/10, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>
> Run task_works in the freezer path. Keep the patch small and simple
> so it can be easily back ported,
Agreed.
I tried to argue with v1 which added the additional task_work_run()
into get_signal(), but I failed to suggest a "better" change which
doesn't uglify/complicate get_signal/backporting.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists