[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240710192027.GE9228@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 21:20:28 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
clm@...a.com, mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] uprobes: make uprobe_register() return struct uprobe
*
On 07/10, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > @@ -3180,10 +3181,8 @@ static void bpf_uprobe_unregister(struct path *path, struct bpf_uprobe *uprobes,
> > {
> > u32 i;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > - uprobe_unregister(d_real_inode(path->dentry), uprobes[i].offset,
> > - &uprobes[i].consumer);
> > - }
>
> nice, we could also drop path argument now
Indeed, I missed that. Will send V2 when/if this makes any sense.
Thanks!
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists