linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] x86/entry_32: Use stack segment selector for VERW operand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8551ef61-71fb-18f3-a8a8-6c7c3ed731e6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:50:50 +0200
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
 Robert Gill <rtgill82@...il.com>, Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>,
 Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
 "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
 antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/entry_32: Use stack segment selector for VERW
 operand



On 10. 07. 24 21:06, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> Robert Gill reported below #GP when dosemu software was executing vm86()
> system call:
> 
>    general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>    CPU: 4 PID: 4610 Comm: dosemu.bin Not tainted 6.6.21-gentoo-x86 #1
>    Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge 1950/0H723K, BIOS 2.7.0 10/30/2010
>    EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
>    EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
>    ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ff8affdc
>    DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
>    CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00c2101c CR3: 04b6d000 CR4: 000406d0
>    Call Trace:
>     show_regs+0x70/0x78
>     die_addr+0x29/0x70
>     exc_general_protection+0x13c/0x348
>     exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
>     handle_exception+0x14d/0x14d
>     exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
>     restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
>     exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
>     restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
> 
> This only happens when VERW based mitigations like MDS/RFDS are enabled.
> This is because segment registers with an arbitrary user value can result
> in #GP when executing VERW. Intel SDM vol. 2C documents the following
> behavior for VERW instruction:
> 
>    #GP(0) - If a memory operand effective address is outside the CS, DS, ES,
> 	   FS, or GS segment limit.
> 
> CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro executes VERW instruction before returning to user
> space. Replace CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS with a safer version that uses %ss to
> refer VERW operand mds_verw_sel. This ensures VERW will not #GP for an
> arbitrary user %ds. Also, in NMI return path, move VERW to after
> RESTORE_ALL_NMI that touches GPRs.
> 
> For clarity, below are the locations where the new CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
> version is being used:
> 
> * entry_INT80_32(), entry_SYSENTER_32() and interrupts (via
>    handle_exception_return) do:
> 
> restore_all_switch_stack:
>    [...]
>     mov    %esi,%esi
>     verw   %ss:0xc0fc92c0  <-------------
>     iret
> 
> * Opportunistic SYSEXIT:
> 
>     [...]
>     verw   %ss:0xc0fc92c0  <-------------
>     btrl   $0x9,(%esp)
>     popf
>     pop    %eax
>     sti
>     sysexit
> 
> *  nmi_return and nmi_from_espfix:
>     mov    %esi,%esi
>     verw   %ss:0xc0fc92c0  <-------------
>     jmp     .Lirq_return
> 
> Fixes: a0e2dab44d22 ("x86/entry_32: Add VERW just before userspace transition")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.10+
> Reported-by: Robert Gill <rtgill82@...il.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218707
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c77ccfd-d561-45a1-8ed5-6b75212c7a58@leemhuis.info/
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> # Use %ss
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - Further simplify the patch by using %ss for all VERW calls in 32-bit mode (Brian).
> - In NMI exit path move VERW after RESTORE_ALL_NMI that touches GPRs (Dave).
> 
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240701-fix-dosemu-vm86-v3-1-b1969532c75a@linux.intel.com
> - Simplify CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE by using %ss instead of %ds (Brian).
> - Do verw before popf in SYSEXIT path (Jari).
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240627-fix-dosemu-vm86-v2-1-d5579f698e77@linux.intel.com
> - Safe guard against any other system calls like vm86() that might change %ds (Dave).
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240426-fix-dosemu-vm86-v1-1-88c826a3f378@linux.intel.com
> ---
> 
> ---
>   arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
> index d3a814efbff6..d54f6002e5a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
> @@ -253,6 +253,16 @@
>   .Lend_\@:
>   .endm
>   
> +/*
> + * Safer version of CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS that uses %ss to reference VERW operand
> + * mds_verw_sel. This ensures VERW will not #GP for an arbitrary user %ds.
> + */
> +.macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
> +	ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lskip_verw\@", "", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> +	verw	%ss:_ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)
> +.Lskip_verw\@:
> +.endm

Why not simply:

.macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
	ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw %ss:_ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), 
X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
.endm

This is how CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS .macro is defined in nospec-branch.h.

Uros.

> +
>   .macro RESTORE_INT_REGS
>   	popl	%ebx
>   	popl	%ecx
> @@ -871,6 +881,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(entry_SYSENTER_32)
>   
>   	/* Now ready to switch the cr3 */
>   	SWITCH_TO_USER_CR3 scratch_reg=%eax
> +	/* Clobbers ZF */
> +	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Restore all flags except IF. (We restore IF separately because
> @@ -881,7 +893,6 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(entry_SYSENTER_32)
>   	BUG_IF_WRONG_CR3 no_user_check=1
>   	popfl
>   	popl	%eax
> -	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Return back to the vDSO, which will pop ecx and edx.
> @@ -951,7 +962,7 @@ restore_all_switch_stack:
>   
>   	/* Restore user state */
>   	RESTORE_REGS pop=4			# skip orig_eax/error_code
> -	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
> +	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
>   .Lirq_return:
>   	/*
>   	 * ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE rely on IRET core serialization
> @@ -1144,7 +1155,6 @@ SYM_CODE_START(asm_exc_nmi)
>   
>   	/* Not on SYSENTER stack. */
>   	call	exc_nmi
> -	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
>   	jmp	.Lnmi_return
>   
>   .Lnmi_from_sysenter_stack:
> @@ -1165,6 +1175,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(asm_exc_nmi)
>   
>   	CHECK_AND_APPLY_ESPFIX
>   	RESTORE_ALL_NMI cr3_reg=%edi pop=4
> +	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
>   	jmp	.Lirq_return
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX32
> @@ -1206,6 +1217,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(asm_exc_nmi)
>   	 *  1 - orig_ax
>   	 */
>   	lss	(1+5+6)*4(%esp), %esp			# back to espfix stack
> +	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_SAFE
>   	jmp	.Lirq_return
>   #endif
>   SYM_CODE_END(asm_exc_nmi)
> 
> ---
> base-commit: f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454
> change-id: 20240426-fix-dosemu-vm86-dd111a01737e
> 
> 
>