linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 32/60] i2c: mv64xxx: reword according to newest specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zo8JUWIfmHhKs4jd@shikoro>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:21:05 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 32/60] i2c: mv64xxx: reword according to newest
 specification


> > -	MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_SLAVE_ACK,
> > -	MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_SLAVE_DATA,
> > +	MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_TARGET_ACK,
> > +	MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_TARGET_DATA,
> 
> I searched online for the datasheet but couldn't find it. It
> would be helpful to know if the SLAVE naming comes from the
> datasheet or if it is arbitrary.

I was considering datasheet names, but obviously I concluded that these
are custom names.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)