[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240710074650.419902-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:46:51 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
To: jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
tursulin@...ulin.net,
airlied@...il.com,
daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Explicitly cast divisor to fix Coccinelle warning
As the comment explains, the if check ensures that the divisor oa_period
is a u32. Explicitly cast oa_period to u32 to remove the following
Coccinelle/coccicheck warning reported by do_div.cocci:
WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 0b1cd4c7a525..24722e758aaf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -4103,7 +4103,7 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct i915_perf *perf,
*/
if (oa_period <= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
u64 tmp = NSEC_PER_SEC;
- do_div(tmp, oa_period);
+ do_div(tmp, (u32)oa_period);
oa_freq_hz = tmp;
} else
oa_freq_hz = 0;
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists