[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABXGCsP_V-Dh97SkLbYZvHSUdfhgXY_-RSqdRwv16hz+r3B3FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:24:25 +0500
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...il.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
dsterba@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com
Subject: Re: 6.10/regression/bisected - after f1d97e769152 I spotted increased
execution time of the kswapd0 process and symptoms as if there is not enough memory
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 7:16 PM Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> That's weird, I think you might be observing some variance.
> I noticed that too for your reports of the test2 branch and the old
> test3 branch, which were very identical, yet you got a very
> significant difference between them.
>
> Thanks.
>
up 1:00
root 269 10.2 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:06 6:13 [kswapd0]
up 2:01
root 269 9.1 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:06 11:07 [kswapd0]
up 3:00
root 269 8.4 0.0 0 0 ? R 10:06 15:18 [kswapd0]
up 4:21
root 269 11.7 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:06 30:33 [kswapd0]
up 5:01
root 269 11.7 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:06 35:19 [kswapd0]
up 6:27
root 269 11.5 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:06 44:39 [kswapd0]
up 7:00
root 269 11.2 0.0 0 0 ? R 10:06 47:18 [kswapd0]
The measurement error can reach ±10 min.
Did you plan to merge the fix before the 6.10 release?
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists