[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zo3RHtQBvz27HiTK@andrea>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 02:09:02 +0200
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Andrea Parri <andrea@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] riscv: Improve amoswap.X use in xchg()
> > I actually see no reason for this patch, please see also my remarks
> > /question on patch #4.
>
> You mean that we can't improve the fully-ordered version here?
Well, I mean, this patch doesn't AFAICT. You've recently fixed these
LR/SC mappings in 1d84afaf0252 ("riscv: Fix fully ordered LR/SC
xchg[8|16]() implementations"), and the remaining look just fine to me.
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists