linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000a7d0da061ce36d5b@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 05:03:03 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+621fd56ba002faba6392@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: aha310510@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc_release

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in smc_release

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc7-syzkaller-g34afb82a3c67-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/20276 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802ba176f8 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
ffff88802ba176f8 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
ffff88802ba176f8 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: start_flush_work kernel/workqueue.c:4138 [inline]
ffff88802ba176f8 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xe6/0xd00 kernel/workqueue.c:4197

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807c4a0258 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_release+0x231/0x530

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3534
       smc_listen_out+0x113/0x3d0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1906
       process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3248 [inline]
       process_scheduled_works+0xab6/0x18e0 kernel/workqueue.c:3329
       worker_thread+0x86d/0xd50 kernel/workqueue.c:3409
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

-> #0 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       touch_work_lockdep_map kernel/workqueue.c:3910 [inline]
       start_flush_work kernel/workqueue.c:4164 [inline]
       __flush_work+0x73c/0xd00 kernel/workqueue.c:4197
       __cancel_work_sync+0xbc/0x110 kernel/workqueue.c:4347
       smc_clcsock_release+0x62/0xf0 net/smc/smc_close.c:29
       __smc_release+0x683/0x800 net/smc/af_smc.c:302
       smc_close_non_accepted+0xd8/0x1f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1838
       smc_close_cleanup_listen net/smc/smc_close.c:45 [inline]
       smc_close_active+0xad8/0xe90 net/smc/smc_close.c:225
       __smc_release+0xa0/0x800 net/smc/af_smc.c:276
       smc_release+0x2d9/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:345
       __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]
       sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421
       __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422
       __do_sys_close fs/open.c:1563 [inline]
       __se_sys_close fs/open.c:1548 [inline]
       __x64_sys_close+0x7f/0x110 fs/open.c:1548
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(sk_lock-AF_SMC/1);
                               lock((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work));
                               lock(sk_lock-AF_SMC/1);
  lock((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work));

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.0/20276:
 #0: ffff8880699e1a10 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
 #0: ffff8880699e1a10 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_release net/socket.c:658 [inline]
 #0: ffff8880699e1a10 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sock_close+0x90/0x240 net/socket.c:1421
 #1: ffff88807c4a0258 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_release+0x231/0x530
 #2: ffffffff8e334820 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8e334820 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8e334820 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: start_flush_work kernel/workqueue.c:4138 [inline]
 #2: ffffffff8e334820 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0xe6/0xd00 kernel/workqueue.c:4197

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 20276 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-syzkaller-g34afb82a3c67-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 touch_work_lockdep_map kernel/workqueue.c:3910 [inline]
 start_flush_work kernel/workqueue.c:4164 [inline]
 __flush_work+0x73c/0xd00 kernel/workqueue.c:4197
 __cancel_work_sync+0xbc/0x110 kernel/workqueue.c:4347
 smc_clcsock_release+0x62/0xf0 net/smc/smc_close.c:29
 __smc_release+0x683/0x800 net/smc/af_smc.c:302
 smc_close_non_accepted+0xd8/0x1f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1838
 smc_close_cleanup_listen net/smc/smc_close.c:45 [inline]
 smc_close_active+0xad8/0xe90 net/smc/smc_close.c:225
 __smc_release+0xa0/0x800 net/smc/af_smc.c:276
 smc_release+0x2d9/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:345
 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]
 sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421
 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422
 __do_sys_close fs/open.c:1563 [inline]
 __se_sys_close fs/open.c:1548 [inline]
 __x64_sys_close+0x7f/0x110 fs/open.c:1548
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f952867bc9a
Code: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 48 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 18 89 7c 24 0c e8 03 7f 02 00 8b 7c 24 0c 89 c2 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 36 89 d7 89 44 24 0c e8 63 7f 02 00 8b 44 24
RSP: 002b:00007fff0f13dee0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000006 RCX: 00007f952867bc9a
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000001b2cb60000 R09: 00007f95287abf8c
R10: 00007fff0f13e030 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00007f95282003f8
R13: ffffffffffffffff R14: 00007f9528200000 R15: 000000000003a6d4
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         34afb82a Merge tag '6.10-rc6-smb3-server-fixes' of git..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=115531e1980000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=451e6d4de6561673
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=621fd56ba002faba6392
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=13d53371980000