linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvs8EmAaxoxzHuEhr73+ppK7=o95yxUkJRE4U7RUjvyEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:00:51 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.39-rc1 review

On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.39 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.39-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

NOTES:
1) The Powerpc build regressions reported and bisected [1]
Email thread link,
 [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYvcbdKN8B9t-ukO2aZCOwkjNme8+XhLcL-=wcd+XXRP6g@mail.gmail.com/

2) The new Build warnings noticed on arm64 [2]
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_int_jit_compile':
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1651:17: warning: ignoring return value
of 'bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro' declared with attribute
'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
 1651 |                 bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(header);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

## Build
* kernel: 6.6.37-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: ca32fab2f2f9ffc305606cc41fe02e41bce06dd6
* git describe: v6.6.36-164-gca32fab2f2f9
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.36-164-gca32fab2f2f9

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)

* powerpc, build
  - clang-18-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - gcc-13-defconfig
  - gcc-8-defconfig


## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.38-140-g3be0ca2a17a0)

## Test result summary
total: 256613, pass: 222330, fail: 3270, skip: 30550, xfail: 463

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 127 total, 127 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org