linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: document the usage of mm->mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240710235159.23b8bc0f5247c358ccea699d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:51:59 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, clm@...a.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
 mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: document the usage of mm->mmap_lock

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:00:45 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:

> The comment above uprobe_write_opcode() is wrong, unapply_uprobe() calls
> it under mmap_read_lock() and this is correct.
> 
> And it is completely unclear why register_for_each_vma() takes mmap_lock
> for writing, add a comment to explain that mmap_write_lock() is needed to
> avoid the following race:
> 
> 	- A task T hits the bp installed by uprobe and calls
> 	  find_active_uprobe()
> 
> 	- uprobe_unregister() removes this uprobe/bp
> 
> 	- T calls find_uprobe() which returns NULL
> 
> 	- another uprobe_register() installs the bp at the same address
> 
> 	- T calls is_trap_at_addr() which returns true
> 
> 	- T returns to handle_swbp() and gets SIGTRAP.
> 
> Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 2c83ba776fc7..d52b624a50fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int update_ref_ctr(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
>   * @vaddr: the virtual address to store the opcode.
>   * @opcode: opcode to be written at @vaddr.
>   *
> - * Called with mm->mmap_lock held for write.
> + * Called with mm->mmap_lock held for read or write.
>   * Return 0 (success) or a negative errno.
>   */
>  int uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
> @@ -1046,7 +1046,12 @@ register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
>  
>  		if (err && is_register)
>  			goto free;
> -
> +		/*
> +		 * We take mmap_lock for writing to avoid the race with
> +		 * find_active_uprobe(), install_breakpoint() must not
> +		 * make is_trap_at_addr() true right after find_uprobe()
> +		 * returns NULL.

Sorry, I couldn't catch the latter part. What is the relationship of
taking the mmap_lock and install_breakpoint() and is_trap_at_addr() here?

You meant that find_active_uprobe() is using find_uprobe() which searchs
uprobe form rbtree? But it seems uprobe is already inserted to the rbtree
in alloc_uprobe() so find_uprobe() will not return NULL here, right?

Thank you,

> +		 */
>  		mmap_write_lock(mm);
>  		vma = find_vma(mm, info->vaddr);
>  		if (!vma || !valid_vma(vma, is_register) ||
> -- 
> 2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>