[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240711-nfsd-next-v1-1-f9f944500503@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:11:13 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Youzhong Yang <youzhong@...il.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: remove unneeded EEXIST error check in
nfsd_do_file_acquire
Given that we do the search and insertion while holding the i_lock, I
don't think it's possible for us to get EEXIST here. Remove this case.
Cc: Youzhong Yang <youzhong@...il.com>
Fixes: c6593366c0bf ("nfsd: don't kill nfsd_files because of lease break error")
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
This is replacement for PATCH 1/3 in the series I sent yesterday. I
think it makes sense to just eliminate this case.
---
fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
index f84913691b78..b9dc7c22242c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
@@ -1038,8 +1038,6 @@ nfsd_file_do_acquire(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
if (likely(ret == 0))
goto open_file;
- if (ret == -EEXIST)
- goto retry;
trace_nfsd_file_insert_err(rqstp, inode, may_flags, ret);
status = nfserr_jukebox;
goto construction_err;
---
base-commit: ec1772c39fa8dd85340b1a02040806377ffbff27
change-id: 20240711-nfsd-next-c9d17f66e2bd
Best regards,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists