linux-kernel - [PATCH Resend] watchdog/perf: Properly initialize the turbo mode timestamp and rearm counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87frsfu15a.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:25:21 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra
 <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org, Arjan van de Ven
 <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH Resend] watchdog/perf: Properly initialize the turbo mode
 timestamp and rearm counter

For systems on which the performance counter can expire early due to turbo
modes it the watchdog handler has a safety net in place which validates
that since the last watchdog event there has at least 4/5th of the watchdog
period elapsed.

This works only reliably after the first watchdog event because the per CPU
variable which holds the timestamp of the last event is never initialized.

So a first spurious event will validate against a timestamp of 0 which
results in a delta which is likely to be way over the 4/5 threshold of
the period. As this might happen before the first watchdog hrtimer event
increments the watchdog counter, this can lead to false positives.

Fix this by initializing the timestamp before enabling the hardware
event. Reset the rearm counter as well, as that might be non zero after
the watchdog was disabled and reenabled.

Fixes: 7edaeb6841df ("kernel/watchdog: Prevent false positives with turbo modes")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
Resend because I screwed up the subject header. Sorry for the noise
---
 kernel/watchdog_perf.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -75,11 +75,15 @@ static bool watchdog_check_timestamp(voi
 	__this_cpu_write(last_timestamp, now);
 	return true;
 }
-#else
-static inline bool watchdog_check_timestamp(void)
+
+static void watchdog_init_timestamp(void)
 {
-	return true;
+	__this_cpu_write(nmi_rearmed, 0);
+	__this_cpu_write(last_timestamp, ktime_get_mono_fast_ns());
 }
+#else
+static inline bool watchdog_check_timestamp(void) { return true; }
+static inline void watchdog_init_timestamp(void) { }
 #endif

 static struct perf_event_attr wd_hw_attr = {
@@ -161,6 +165,7 @@ void watchdog_hardlockup_enable(unsigned
 	if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&watchdog_cpus))
 		pr_info("Enabled. Permanently consumes one hw-PMU counter.\n");

+	watchdog_init_timestamp();
 	perf_event_enable(this_cpu_read(watchdog_ev));
 }