linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move struct balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZpBJPRf5lnXxccH6@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:05 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: void@...ifault.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
	schatzberg.dan@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	changwoo@...lia.com, righi.andrea@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move struct balance_callback definition upward

Hello,

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:13:58PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Move struct balance_callback definition upward so that it's visible to
> class-specific rq struct definitions. This will be used to embed a struct
> balance_callback in struct scx_rq.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

Unless there are objections, as this is really trivial, I'll apply it
together with other patches. Please holler if there are any concerns.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun