linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: mtd: macronix,mx25l12833f: add SPI-NOR chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D2N20HB4BIC4.O13SZINCMJ9P@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:13:45 +0200
From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
To: "Erez" <erezgeva2@...il.com>
Cc: "Esben Haabendal" <esben@...nix.com>, "Tudor Ambarus"
 <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, "Jaime Liao" <jaimeliao@...c.com.tw>,
 <leoyu@...c.com.tw>, "Alvin Zhou" <alvinzhou@...c.com.tw>, "Julien Su"
 <juliensu@...c.com.tw>, "Erez Geva" <erezgeva@...ime.org>,
 <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, "Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@...nel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Miquel Raynal"
 <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, "Richard Weinberger" <richard@....at>,
 "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@...com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "Rob
 Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: mtd: macronix,mx25l12833f: add
 SPI-NOR chip

On Fri Jul 12, 2024 at 12:09 AM CEST, Erez wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 21:57, Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Erez,
> >
> > No top posting please, see also
> > https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html
>
> It was a single question. Which I think can be answered in one reply.
> In cases where there are different parts in the mail, it makes sense
> to avoid top posting.
> I do not believe we need to be pedantic.
> The guidance is not holy, it is aimed to make communication more comprehensive.
>
> >
> > On Thu Jul 11, 2024 at 8:57 PM CEST, Erez wrote:
> > > Yes, I think we should.

Regarding top posting, what was the question here?

I don't see any context. So don't expect any reply from me.

-michael