[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <696425a1-8e71-464f-9fe7-b965452b9d84@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:55:52 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ye Li <ye.li@....com>, Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: needn't wait 2.5 clocks after
RCS is done for iMX93
On 7/11/24 15:41, Frank Li wrote:
> From: Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
>
> i.MX93 watchdog needn't wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is done. So set
> post_rcs_wait to false for "fsl,imx93-wdt".
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <ye.li@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
> index 904b9f1873856..3a75a6f98f8f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature imx8ulp_wdt_hw = {
> static const struct imx_wdt_hw_feature imx93_wdt_hw = {
> .prescaler_enable = true,
> .wdog_clock_rate = 125,
> - .post_rcs_wait = true,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id imx7ulp_wdt_dt_ids[] = {
>
Introducing that flag in the previous patch just to remove it here doesn't
make sense to me, sorry.
What the two changes do together is to disable post_rcs_wait for iMX93.
That is a single logical change, and it can and should be done in a
single patch. If you do that by moving the flag into imx_wdt_hw_feature
or by adding another of_device_is_compatible() is your call.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists