[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2c88f85-eefb-411c-bfe0-6a476b449753@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:17:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, andersson@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, quic_anupkulk@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add UART node
On 11/07/2024 07:04, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
>>>> + clock-names = "se";
>>>> + interconnects = <&clk_virt MASTER_QUP_CORE_2 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>>>> + &clk_virt SLAVE_QUP_CORE_2 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
>>>> + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>>>> + &config_noc SLAVE_QUP_2 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
>>>> + interconnect-names = "qup-core", "qup-config";
>>>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SA8775P_CX>;
>>>
>>> All the clocks, interconenct and power domains look to me questionable.
>>> AFAIK, most of it (if not all) is going to be removed.
>>
>> Yeah.. I'm lukewarm on accepting any sa8775p changes until that qcs9100(?)
>> situation is squared out first
>>
>> Konrad
>
> Thanks for clarification. Please help to sign-off or let me know in case
> of any concern.
I think I was quite explicit, so I feel above suggestion as still
pushing your choice even though to reviewers gave you their opinion.
In such case:
No, NAK, for the reasons stated above.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists