[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240711083547.3981-4-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:35:43 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: Remove cpus_read_lock() from apply_wqattrs_lock()
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
The pwq creations and installations have been reworked based on
wq_online_cpumask rather than cpu_online_mask.
So cpus_read_lock() is unneeded during wqattrs changes.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 9f454a9c04c8..64876d391e7c 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5123,15 +5123,12 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
static void apply_wqattrs_lock(void)
{
- /* CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations */
- cpus_read_lock();
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
}
static void apply_wqattrs_unlock(void)
{
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
- cpus_read_unlock();
}
/**
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists