[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG=2xmMsgmZosNvuVC-uGjkKGQfSq0kjwpMSgS46jpd5Zbpp7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:41:08 +0000
From: Adrián Moreno <amorenoz@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, dev@...nvswitch.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: openvswitch: retry instead of sleep
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:04:59AM GMT, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> There are a couple of places where the test script "sleep"s to wait for
> some external condition to be met.
>
> This is error prone, specially in slow systems (identified in CI by
> "KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW=yes").
>
> To fix this, add a "ovs_wait" function that tries to execute a command
> a few times until it succeeds. The timeout used is set to 5s for
> "normal" systems and doubled if a slow CI machine is detected.
>
> This should make the following work:
>
> $ vng --build \
> --config tools/testing/selftests/net/config \
> --config kernel/configs/debug.config
>
> $ vng --run . --user root -- "make -C tools/testing/selftests/ \
> KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW=yes TARGETS=net/openvswitch run_tests"
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@...hat.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh | 45 +++++++++++++++----
> .../selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh
> index bc71dbc18b21..cc0bfae2bafa 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh
> @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ ksft_skip=4
> PAUSE_ON_FAIL=no
> VERBOSE=0
> TRACING=0
> +WAIT_TIMEOUT=5
> +
> +if test "X$KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW" == "Xyes"; then
> + WAIT_TIMEOUT=10
> +fi
>
> tests="
> arp_ping eth-arp: Basic arp ping between two NS
> @@ -29,6 +34,30 @@ info() {
> [ $VERBOSE = 0 ] || echo $*
> }
>
> +ovs_wait() {
> + info "waiting $WAIT_TIMEOUT s for: $@"
> +
> + if "$@" ; then
> + info "wait succeeded immediately"
> + return 0
> + fi
> +
> + # A quick re-check helps speed up small races in fast systems.
> + # However, fractional sleeps might not necessarily work.
> + local start=0
> + sleep 0.1 || { sleep 1; start=1; }
> +
> + for (( i=start; i<WAIT_TIMEOUT; i++ )); do
> + if "$@" ; then
> + info "wait succeeded after $i seconds"
> + return 0
> + fi
> + sleep 1
> + done
> + info "wait failed after $i seconds"
> + return 1
> +}
> +
> ovs_base=`pwd`
> sbxs=
> sbx_add () {
> @@ -278,20 +307,19 @@ test_psample() {
>
> # Record psample data.
> ovs_spawn_daemon "test_psample" python3 $ovs_base/ovs-dpctl.py psample-events
> + ovs_wait grep -q "listening for psample events" ${ovs_dir}/stdout
>
> # Send a single ping.
> - sleep 1
> ovs_sbx "test_psample" ip netns exec client ping -I c1 172.31.110.20 -c 1 || return 1
> - sleep 1
>
> # We should have received one userspace action upcall and 2 psample packets.
> - grep -E "userspace action command" $ovs_dir/s0.out >/dev/null 2>&1 || return 1
> + ovs_wait grep -q "userspace action command" $ovs_dir/s0.out || return 1
>
> # client -> server samples should only contain the first 14 bytes of the packet.
> - grep -E "rate:4294967295,group:1,cookie:c0ffee data:[0-9a-f]{28}$" \
> - $ovs_dir/stdout >/dev/null 2>&1 || return 1
> - grep -E "rate:4294967295,group:2,cookie:eeff0c" \
> - $ovs_dir/stdout >/dev/null 2>&1 || return 1
> + ovs_wait grep -qE "rate:4294967295,group:1,cookie:c0ffee data:[0-9a-f]{28}$" \
> + $ovs_dir/stdout || return 1
> +
> + ovs_wait grep -q "rate:4294967295,group:2,cookie:eeff0c" $ovs_dir/stdout || return 1
>
> return 0
> }
> @@ -711,7 +739,8 @@ test_upcall_interfaces() {
> ovs_add_netns_and_veths "test_upcall_interfaces" ui0 upc left0 l0 \
> 172.31.110.1/24 -u || return 1
>
> - sleep 1
> + ovs_wait grep -q "listening on upcall packet handler" ${ovs_dir}/left0.out
> +
> info "sending arping"
> ip netns exec upc arping -I l0 172.31.110.20 -c 1 \
> >$ovs_dir/arping.stdout 2>$ovs_dir/arping.stderr
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py
> index 1e15b0818074..8a0396bfaf99 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/ovs-dpctl.py
> @@ -2520,6 +2520,7 @@ class PsampleEvent(EventSocket):
> marshal_class = psample_msg
>
> def read_samples(self):
> + print("listening for psample events", flush=True)
> while True:
> try:
> for msg in self.get():
> --
> 2.45.2
>
This patch is supposed to fix openvswitch selftests on "-dbg" machines.
However, as Simon points out, all recent rounds are failing [1]. I don't
see this patch being included in the batches and I was wondering why.
Also I see a (presumably unrelated) build error netdev/build_32bit.
Is there anything I can do?
[1]
https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?executor=vmksft-net-dbg&test=openvswitch-sh
Thanks.
Adrián
Powered by blists - more mailing lists