lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024071153-implicit-creole-a40b@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:43:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/102] 6.1.98-rc1 review

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:10:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.98 release.
> > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.98-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> We have two major regressions.
> 
> 1)
> As I have reported on 6.9.9-rc1 same kernel BUG and panic noticed [1]
> while running kunit tests on all test environments [1] seen on 6.1.98-rc1.
> 
> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xb0/0x17c
> 
>  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsqkB4=pVZyELyj3YqUc9jXFfgNULsPk9t8q-+P1w_G6A@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> 2)
> S390 build failed due to following build errors on 6.1 and 6.6.
> Build error:
> ----
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:253:11: error: expected ';' at end
> of declaration
>   253 |         psw_t psw __uninitialized;
>       |                  ^
>       |                  ;
>  [2] https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2j0YAKrnHmvjt4fKPfYoEmSKWlG/

Thanks, I'll go drop this from 6.6 and older queues now, seems that
__unitialized doesn't work on older kernels just yet.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ