linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] orphaned fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <da61490f-2d28-45ce-a6ba-2d424f50557a@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 19:01:09 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] orphaned fixes

Which approach do you prefer, Linus?

On 2024/06/25 13:53, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> These are orphaned patches which nobody can take (and as a result bugs
> remain unfixed for years). These patches have been tested using linux-next
> tree via my tomoyo tree since 20240611, and nobody found problems.
> 
> I send to you as per THE REST rule in MAINTAINERS file. Do you want me
> to send these patches as a git pull request (or not worth creating tags
> for pull requests) ?
> 
>   [PATCH 1/2] profiling: initialize prof_cpu_mask from profile_online_cpu()
> 
>     kernel/ksysfs.c  | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>     kernel/profile.c |  6 +++---
>     2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
>   [PATCH 2/2] Input: MT - limit max slots
> 
>     drivers/input/input-mt.c | 3 +++
>     1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)