[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240711102436.4432-7-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:24:34 +0000
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
To: <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<namhyung@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<irogers@...gle.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <kees@...nel.org>, <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
<rui.zhang@...el.com>, <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
CC: <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>, <ananth.narayan@....com>,
<gautham.shenoy@....com>, <kprateek.nayak@....com>, <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
<sandipan.das@....com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add wrapper for online/offline functions
This is in preparation for the addition of per-core RAPL counter support
for AMD CPUs.
The CPU online and offline functions will need to handle the setting up and
migration of the new per-core PMU as well. The wrapper functions added
below will make it easier to pass the corresponding args for both the PMUs.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index e3d0a82e12b9..1d36565d0cb9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -565,10 +565,10 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
[PERF_RAPL_PSYS] = { 0, &rapl_events_psys_group, NULL, false, 0 },
};
-static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
+static int __rapl_cpu_offline(struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus, unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx,
+ const struct cpumask *event_cpumask, unsigned int cpu)
{
- const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
- struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[rapl_pmu_idx];
int target;
/* Check if exiting cpu is used for collecting rapl events */
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
rapl_pmu->cpu = -1;
/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
- target = cpumask_any_but(rapl_pmu_cpumask, cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(event_cpumask, cpu);
/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -588,11 +588,16 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
- const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
- struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
+ return __rapl_cpu_offline(rapl_pmus, get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu),
+ get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+}
+
+static int __rapl_cpu_online(struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus, unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx,
+ const struct cpumask *event_cpumask, unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[rapl_pmu_idx];
int target;
if (!rapl_pmu) {
@@ -613,7 +618,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
* Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
* events already.
*/
- target = cpumask_any_and(rapl_pmus->cpumask, rapl_pmu_cpumask);
+ target = cpumask_any_and(rapl_pmus->cpumask, event_cpumask);
if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
return 0;
@@ -622,6 +627,13 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
+static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return __rapl_cpu_online(rapl_pmus, get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu),
+ get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+}
+
+
static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void)
{
u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists