[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b1384e7-e75d-4d71-8798-0d47c33cece6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 19:49:15 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, alexs@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Yoann Congal
<yoann.congal@...le.fr>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [REF PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slab: decouple the SLAB_OBJ_EXT from MEMCG
On 7/11/24 4:11 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 7/10/24 7:43 AM, alexs@...nel.org wrote:
>> From: "Alex Shi (Tencent)" <alexs@...nel.org>
>>
>> commit 21c690a349ba ("mm: introduce slabobj_ext to support slab object
>> extensions") selected SLAB_OBJ_EXT on MEMCG just for SLAB_MATCH
>> memcg_data, that included SLAB_OBJ_EXT for MEMCG. In fact, I didn't see
>> the necessary to enable SLAB_OBJ_EXT for MEMCG.
>>
>> Let's decouple the SLAB_OBJ_EXT from MEMCG and move out
>> alloc_slab_obj_exts() definition from SLAB_OBJ_EXT only. To alignment
>> the alloc_slab_obj_exts() return 0 for good. change its return value to
>> '-1' for always failed with !SLAB_OBJ_EXT. Now we could save unnecessary
>> code from MEMCG but !SLAB_OBJ_EXT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (Tencent) <alexs@...nel.org>
>
> This seems just wrong to me. The memcg hooks for slab do use obj_ext. You
> made alloc_slab_obj_exts() return -1 and that will just fail all memcg
> charging (unless alloc profiling selects obj_ext). The kernel will appear to
> work, but memcg charging for slab won't happen at all.
>
> So no, it can't be decoupled for slab, only for pages/folios (patch 1).
Hi Vlastimil,
Thanks a lot for clarification! Yes, the patch isn't correct.
Just forgive my stupidity, why the memcg needs SLAB_OBJ_EXT?
And why we need to alloc_slab_obj_exts() at line 3019 with !slab_obj_exts?
3015 for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
3016 slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]);
3017
3018 if (!slab_obj_exts(slab) &&
3019 alloc_slab_obj_exts(slab, s, flags, false)) {
3020 obj_cgroup_uncharge(objcg, obj_full_size(s));
3021 continue;
3022 }
Thanks!
Alex
>
>
>> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>
>> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>> ---
>> init/Kconfig | 1 -
>> mm/slab.h | 6 +++---
>> mm/slub.c | 6 +++---
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
>> index 26bf8bb0a7ce..61e43ac9fe75 100644
>> --- a/init/Kconfig
>> +++ b/init/Kconfig
>> @@ -965,7 +965,6 @@ config MEMCG
>> bool "Memory controller"
>> select PAGE_COUNTER
>> select EVENTFD
>> - select SLAB_OBJ_EXT
>> help
>> Provides control over the memory footprint of tasks in a cgroup.
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
>> index 8ffdd4f315f8..6c727ecc1068 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab.h
>> +++ b/mm/slab.h
>> @@ -559,9 +559,6 @@ static inline struct slabobj_ext *slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
>> return (struct slabobj_ext *)(obj_exts & ~OBJEXTS_FLAGS_MASK);
>> }
>>
>> -int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
>> - gfp_t gfp, bool new_slab);
>> -
>> #else /* CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT */
>>
>> static inline struct slabobj_ext *slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
>> @@ -571,6 +568,9 @@ static inline struct slabobj_ext *slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT */
>>
>> +int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
>> + gfp_t gfp, bool new_slab);
>> +
>> static inline enum node_stat_item cache_vmstat_idx(struct kmem_cache *s)
>> {
>> return (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index cc11f3869cc6..f531c2d67238 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -2075,10 +2075,10 @@ alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, void **p,
>>
>> #else /* CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT */
>>
>> -static int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
>> - gfp_t gfp, bool new_slab)
>> +int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s,
>> + gfp_t gfp, bool new_slab)
>> {
>> - return 0;
>> + return -1;
>> }
>>
>> static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists