[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09e24e13-abd8-4f42-a1a1-b2f86054bb1b@t-8ch.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:02:56 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, "Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)" <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kbuild: add script and target to generate pacman
package
On 2024-07-11 09:32:23+0000, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> Sorry, I sent my last mail to quickly. Three things below:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:32:28PM +0200 Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > pacman is the package manager used by Arch Linux and its derivates.
> > Creating native packages from the kernel tree has multiple advantages:
> >
> > * The package triggers the correct hooks for initramfs generation and
> > bootloader configuration
> > * Uninstallation is complete and also invokes the relevant hooks
> > * New UAPI headers can be installed without any manual bookkeeping
> >
> > The PKGBUILD file is a simplified version of the one used for the
> > downstream Arch Linux "linux" package.
>
> The package is actually called "linux-upstream", right?
The new in-kernel package is called "linux-upstream", correct.
But the package shipped by Arch Linux itself, which I'm referring to
here, is called "linux".
> > Extra steps that should not be necessary for a development kernel have
> > been removed and an UAPI header package has been added.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> > Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Update MRPROPER_FILES
> > - Unify shell variable syntax
> > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708-kbuild-pacman-pkg-v3-1-885df3cbc740@weissschuh.net
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Enforce matching architectures for installation
> > - Add Reviewed-by and Tested-by from Nathan
> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240706-kbuild-pacman-pkg-v2-1-613422a03a7a@weissschuh.net
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Replace ${MAKE} with $MAKE for consistency with other variables
> > - Use $MAKE for "-s image_name"
> > - Avoid permission warnings from build directory
> > - Clarify reason for /build symlink removal
> > - Install System.map and config
> > - Install dtbs where available
> > - Allow cross-build through arch=any
> > - Sort Contributor/Maintainer chronologically
> > - Disable some unneeded makepkg options
> > - Use DEPMOD=true for consistency with rpm-package
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240704-kbuild-pacman-pkg-v1-1-ac2f63f5fa7b@weissschuh.net
> > ---
> > .gitignore | 6 ++++
> > Makefile | 2 +-
> > scripts/Makefile.package | 16 ++++++++++
> > scripts/package/PKGBUILD | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> > index c59dc60ba62e..7902adf4f7f1 100644
> > --- a/.gitignore
> > +++ b/.gitignore
> > @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ modules.order
> > #
> > /tar-install/
> >
> > +#
> > +# pacman files (make pacman-pkg)
> > +#
> > +/PKGBUILD
> > +/pacman/
> > +
> > #
> > # We don't want to ignore the following even if they are dot-files
> > #
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index b25b5b44af10..79e8dcec6be9 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@ CLEAN_FILES += vmlinux.symvers modules-only.symvers \
> > # Directories & files removed with 'make mrproper'
> > MRPROPER_FILES += include/config include/generated \
> > arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated .objdiff \
> > - debian snap tar-install \
> > + debian snap tar-install PKGBUILD pacman \
>
> (thanks!)
>
> > .config .config.old .version \
> > Module.symvers \
> > certs/signing_key.pem \
> > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.package b/scripts/Makefile.package
> > index bf016af8bf8a..a5b5b899d90c 100644
> > --- a/scripts/Makefile.package
> > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.package
> > @@ -141,6 +141,21 @@ snap-pkg:
> > cd $(objtree)/snap && \
> > snapcraft --target-arch=$(UTS_MACHINE)
> >
> > +# pacman-pkg
> > +# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +
> > +PHONY += pacman-pkg
> > +pacman-pkg:
> > + @ln -srf $(srctree)/scripts/package/PKGBUILD $(objtree)/PKGBUILD
> > + cd $(objtree) && \
>
> Please prefix this line with a '+' to allow make job-server delegation to
> sub-make called via makepkg. This will prevent the make warning
>
> make[3]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add '+' to parent make rule.
I don't see thiss warning in my GNU Make 4.4.1.
(But job-server delegation seems to work)
Maybe it's needed for other make versions or jobserver implementations,
I'll add it.
> > + srctree="$(realpath $(srctree))" \
> > + objtree="$(realpath $(objtree))" \
> > + BUILDDIR="$(realpath $(objtree))/pacman" \
> > + CARCH="$(UTS_MACHINE)" \
> > + KBUILD_MAKEFLAGS="$(MAKEFLAGS)" \
> > + KBUILD_REVISION="$(shell $(srctree)/init/build-version)" \
>
> Just a note: In Masahiro's current kbuild tree 'build-version' has been moved
> to scripts/build-version. But I don't know on which base this patch will
> possibly be applied to.
The patch is based on Linus' tree.
But I expect it to go in via the kbuild tree, so it should be updated.
Thanks for the pointer!
> > + makepkg
> > +
> > # dir-pkg tar*-pkg - tarball targets
> > # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > @@ -221,6 +236,7 @@ help:
> > @echo ' bindeb-pkg - Build only the binary kernel deb package'
> > @echo ' snap-pkg - Build only the binary kernel snap package'
> > @echo ' (will connect to external hosts)'
> > + @echo ' pacman-pkg - Build only the binary kernel pacman package'
> > @echo ' dir-pkg - Build the kernel as a plain directory structure'
> > @echo ' tar-pkg - Build the kernel as an uncompressed tarball'
> > @echo ' targz-pkg - Build the kernel as a gzip compressed tarball'
> > diff --git a/scripts/package/PKGBUILD b/scripts/package/PKGBUILD
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b0b133ac28eb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/scripts/package/PKGBUILD
> > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +# Maintainer: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> > +# Contributor: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@...hlinux.org>
>
> I am not familiar enough with makepkg/PKGBUILD: Does it make sense to put
> 'set -e' here, as we (will) do in other kbuild scripts? ('set -u' breaks
> 'makepkg'.) Without 'set -e', shellcheck asks for error handling around 'cd'
> commands.
Inside prepare(), build() etc. it is already enabled.
IMO it doesn't make sense to second-guess makepkg here.
> > +
> > +pkgbase=linux-upstream
> > +pkgname=("$pkgbase" "$pkgbase-headers" "$pkgbase-api-headers")
> > +pkgver="${KERNELRELEASE//-/_}"
> > +pkgrel="$KBUILD_REVISION"
> > +pkgdesc='Linux'
> > +url='https://www.kernel.org/'
> > +arch=($CARCH)
> > +options=(!debug !strip !buildflags !makeflags)
> > +license=(GPL-2.0-only)
> > +
> > +build() {
> > + export MAKEFLAGS="$KBUILD_MAKEFLAGS"
> > + cd "$objtree"
> > +
> > + # makepkg does a "chmod a-srw", triggering warnings during kbuild
> > + chmod 0755 "$pkgdirbase" || true
> > +
> > + $MAKE -f "$srctree/Makefile"
> > +}
> > +
> > +package_linux-upstream() {
> > + pkgdesc="The $pkgdesc kernel and modules"
> > +
> > + export MAKEFLAGS="$KBUILD_MAKEFLAGS"
> > + cd "$objtree"
> > + local modulesdir="$pkgdir/usr/$MODLIB"
> > +
> > + echo "Installing boot image..."
> > + # systemd expects to find the kernel here to allow hibernation
> > + # https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/edda44605f06a41fb86b7ab8128dcf99161d2344
> > + install -Dm644 "$($MAKE -s image_name)" "$modulesdir/vmlinuz"
> > +
> > + # Used by mkinitcpio to name the kernel
> > + echo "$pkgbase" | install -Dm644 /dev/stdin "$modulesdir/pkgbase"
>
> This looks funny, I think I'd just use echo "$pkgbase" >"$modulesdir/pkgbase",
> but this is probably just bike-shedding.
It's from the original PKGBUILD.
But you are right, it looks funky and I'll change it.
> So, all in all it looks good to me, thanks!
>
> With the jobserver-'+'-prefix added:
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists