[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BF0DCCB8-EB5D-433D-87C0-3FA82E2C09EC@meta.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:59:47 +0000
From: Manu Bretelle <chantra@...a.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
CC: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Mykola Lysenko
<mykolal@...a.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau
<martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song
<yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org"
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: DENYLIST.aarch64: Remove fexit_sleep
> On Jul 12, 2024, at 11:08 AM, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing the fix.
>
> This bug has been resolved now but the test still hangs sometimes.
> Unfortunately, I am not able to reproduce this hang
> using vmtest.
I have not able to reproduce the original error either. I will try to reproduce on the actual CI host next week (which are native arm64 host compared to my local setup which uses full emulation).
> Can you extract some logs from the CI somehow?? If it is
> hanging in the kernel there should be some
> soft lockup or RCU lockup related messages.
I think once we execute the test, vmtest does not track the console logs anymore, so we won’t see those. That should be fixable, but for now, I won’t be able to get more logs than you get from the UI currently.
>
> I was talking about this with Kumar and we think that this test is
> hanging in the userspace in the following loop:
>
> while (READ_ONCE(fexit_skel->bss->fentry_cnt) != 2);
>
> Could it be that fentry_cnt is > 2 somehow before we reach this?? This
> is only a random guess though.
>
Manu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists