[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXZGTbXZkyW7QLTYU6vZkiiTSvJrBigcN=QYiaP3C9n5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:19:58 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tools subcmd: Add non-waitpid check_if_command_finished()
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:33 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:24:50PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:24 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ian,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:42:35PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > Using waitpid can cause stdout/stderr of the child process to be
> > > > lost. Use Linux's /prod/<pid>/status file to determine if the process
> > > > has reached the zombie state. Use the 'status' file rather than 'stat'
> > > > to avoid issues around skipping the process name.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c b/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > > > index 4e3a557a2f37..ec06683e77a0 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > > #include <unistd.h>
> > > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > > > +#include <ctype.h>
> > > > #include <fcntl.h>
> > > > #include <string.h>
> > > > #include <linux/string.h>
> > > > @@ -217,8 +218,40 @@ static int wait_or_whine(struct child_process *cmd, bool block)
> > > >
> > > > int check_if_command_finished(struct child_process *cmd)
> > > > {
> > > > +#ifdef __linux__
> > >
> > > Is this really necessary? I don't think we plan to support other OS..
> >
> > I don't think it'd be unreasonable to say run "perf report" on
> > Windows, or using wasm inside a web browser. Part of the reason for
> > doing things this way was to keep the WNOHANG logic although this
> > change no longer uses it for __linux__.
>
> I'm not sure we are ready to run it on other platforms. So I think
> it's better simply remove it for now.
So in the office hours there was some discussion with a potential new
contributor whose development platform is OS/X. It's fairly obvious
this code can't work on anything but Linux and using #error feels
annoying. The waitpid code is tested and has a known issue, but I
think it is better than just breaking anyone not on Linux.
Thanks,
Ian
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> > > > + char filename[FILENAME_MAX + 12];
> > > > + char status_line[256];
> > > > + FILE *status_file;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Check by reading /proc/<pid>/status as calling waitpid causes
> > > > + * stdout/stderr to be closed and data lost.
> > > > + */
> > > > + sprintf(filename, "/proc/%d/status", cmd->pid);
> > > > + status_file = fopen(filename, "r");
> > > > + if (status_file == NULL) {
> > > > + /* Open failed assume finish_command was called. */
> > > > + return true;
> > > > + }
> > > > + while (fgets(status_line, sizeof(status_line), status_file) != NULL) {
> > > > + char *p;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (strncmp(status_line, "State:", 6))
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > + fclose(status_file);
> > > > + p = status_line + 6;
> > > > + while (isspace(*p))
> > > > + p++;
> > > > + return *p == 'Z';
> > > > + }
> > > > + /* Read failed assume finish_command was called. */
> > > > + fclose(status_file);
> > > > + return true;
> > > > +#else
> > > > wait_or_whine(cmd, /*block=*/false);
> > > > return cmd->finished;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > int finish_command(struct child_process *cmd)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
> > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists