linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: allow tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240712-imx_rproc-v1-5-7bcf6732d328@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:34:58 +0800
From: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, 
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, 
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, 
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: allow tx_block to be set

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>

Current tx_block is set to true, but there is case that no need to wait
response. Linux just needs to send data to remote processor, so let's
allow tx_block could be set to false.

Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 552fccebf7e2..01cf1dfb2e87 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem {
 #define ATT_CORE_MASK   0xffff
 #define ATT_CORE(I)     BIT((I))
 
-static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc);
+static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc, bool tx_block);
 static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
 
 struct imx_rproc {
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
+	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc, true);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
 
 static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
-	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
+	return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc, true);
 }
 
 static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg)
 	queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->rproc_work);
 }
 
-static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc, bool tx_block)
 {
 	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
 	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	cl = &priv->cl;
 	cl->dev = dev;
-	cl->tx_block = true;
+	cl->tx_block = tx_block;
 	cl->tx_tout = 100;
 	cl->knows_txdone = false;
 	cl->rx_callback = imx_rproc_rx_callback;
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_rproc_vq_work);
 
-	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
+	ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc, true);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_put_wkq;
 

-- 
2.37.1