linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: Improve sbi_ecall() code generation by reordering arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <172077963254.4770.3789114985844710075.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 10:20:32 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
 palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, samuel.holland@...ive.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Improve sbi_ecall() code generation by reordering
 arguments

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>:

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:26:29 +0100 you wrote:
> The sbi_ecall() function arguments are not in the same order as the
> ecall arguments, so we end up re-ordering the registers before the
> ecall which is useless and costly.
> 
> So simply reorder the arguments in the same way as expected by ecall.
> Instead of reordering directly the arguments of sbi_ecall(), use a proxy
> macro since the current ordering is more natural.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - riscv: Improve sbi_ecall() code generation by reordering arguments
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/16badacd8af4

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html