[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240712102627.GA31100@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:26:27 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, clm@...a.com,
paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] perf/uprobe: Convert single-step and uretprobe
to SRCU
On 07/11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> uprobe_free_stage1
> call_srcu(&uretprobe_srcu, &uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_stage2);
>
> put_uprobe()
> if (refcount_dec_and_test)
> call_srcu(&uprobes_srcu, &uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_stage1);
>
>
> So my thinking was since we take uretprobe_srcu *inside* uprobe_srcu,
Ah, indeed! Somehow misread the change in put_uprobe() as if it
uses call_rcu(uretprobe_srcu).
Thanks,
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists