[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpE1Jn5ZbQikAHmI@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 06:52:38 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] soc: fsl: qbman: FSL_DPAA depends on
COMPILE_TEST
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 03:14:00PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:00:25AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> >
> > As most of the drivers that depend on ARCH_LAYERSCAPE, make FSL_DPAA
> > depend on COMPILE_TEST for compilation and testing.
> >
> > # grep -r depends.\*ARCH_LAYERSCAPE.\*COMPILE_TEST | wc -l
> > 29
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > ---
>
> I don't know why nipa says there are 800+ new warnings/errors introduced
> by this patch, but it looks like a false positive (or I can't seem to
> find something relevant).
Right, All of the warnings are basically a set of MODULES_DESCRIPTION()
that are missing in other parts of the kernel, and not related to this
patch series. None of them seems to be in the network stack. (for
context, I've fixed all the missing MODULES_DESCRIPTION in the past).
nipa also complained about an unused variable, and we have a patch for
it already:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240712134817.913756-1-leitao@debian.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists