linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DyP_V7+hSGm6q2ReTUhQ6ebTaLrx=qNhkuFSpCHc+8NA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:30:14 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: linux@...ck-us.net, alice.guo@....com, imx@...ts.linux.dev, 
	kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, 
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, 
	ye.li@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into
 struct imx_wdt_hw_feature

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 11:19 AM Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com> wrote:
>
> Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simple code logic for
> difference compatible string.
>
> i.MX93 watchdog needn't wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is done. So needn't set

s/needn't/does not need

You mention i.MX93 here, but the code touches i.MX8ULP. Is that correct?