lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024071323-disarray-moody-1e0b@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:05:52 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ashwin Kamat <ashwin.kamat@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
	vasavi.sirnapalli@...adcom.com, tapas.kundu@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10 0/2] Fix for CVE-2024-36901

On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 03:16:15PM +0530, Ashwin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> The patches get applied to 5.10 stable branch with an offset [i.e Hunk #1
> succeeded at 240 (offset 19 lines).]
> To avoid that I sent separate patches to 5.10 and 5.15. Apart from that
> there is no other difference.

That's not what I asked, I asked:

> > Any reason you didn't actually cc: the stable@...r.kernel.org address
> > for these so we know to pick them up?

That is a requirement to get a patch merged into a stable release,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ