[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MA0P287MB2822B352F67009BA8EF4A312FEA72@MA0P287MB2822.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:13:50 +0800
From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
Chao Wei <chao.wei@...hgo.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add board support for Sipeed LicheeRV Nano
On 2024/7/12 22:15, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 09:33:46AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>>> .../interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml | 1 +
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/sophgo.yaml | 5 ++
>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile | 1 +
>>> .../boot/dts/sophgo/sg2002-licheerv-nano-b.dts | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2002.dtsi | 32 +++++++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
>> How about letting me PR all the four patches in this patchset? Because they
>> are all related to sophgo, it would be better to PR them together to avoid
>> confusion.
>> Especially about the change of sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml, my original
>> understanding was that it should be handled by you.
> No, stuff like the plic should really be handled by Thomas as he is the
> interrupt controller maintainer, not by me. Usually though, neither the
> timer or interrupt controller maintainers seem to care about these sorts
> of binding patches which is why they ended up going with the dts.
> Ideally the plic patch would go through the tip tree, but I think
> there's unlikely to be sleep lost over a trivial binding change going
> with the dts user.
Thank you Cornor for your input, I will handle these patches together
with dts.
Regards,
Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists