[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240713021911.1631517-1-ast@fiberby.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 02:18:57 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 00/13] flower: rework TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_FLAGS usage
This series reworks the recently added TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_FLAGS
attribute, to be more like TCA_FLOWER_KEY_FLAGS, and use the unused
u32 flags field in FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL, instead of adding
a new flags field as FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_FLAGS.
I have defined the new FLOW_DIS_F_* and TCA_FLOWER_KEY_FLAGS_*
flags to co-exist with the existing flags, so the meaning
of the flags field in struct flow_dissector_key_control is not
depending on the context it is used in. If we run out of bits
then we can always split them up later, if we really want to.
Future flags might also be valid in both contexts.
iproute2 RFC v2 patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/560bcd549ca8ab24b1ad5abe352580a621f6d426.1720790774.git.dcaratti@redhat.com/
---
Changelog:
v4:
- Define control flags in ynl
- Describe enc-flags in ynl
- Propagate tca[TCA_OPTIONS] to NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK
(all 3 requested by Jakub)
- Link to new iproute2 patch in cover
- Add Reviewed-By from Davide to patches that haven't changed since v3.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/20240709163825.1210046-1-ast@fiberby.net/
- Retitle patch 1 (tunnel flags -> control flags)
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20240705133348.728901-1-ast@fiberby.net/
- Refactor flower control flag definitions
(requested by Jakub and Alexander)
- Add Tested-by from Davide Caratti on patch 3-10.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20240703104600.455125-1-ast@fiberby.net/
- Change netlink attribute type from NLA_U32 to NLA_BE32.
- Ensure that the FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL
is also masked for non-IP.
- Fix preexisting typo in kdoc for struct flow_dissector_key_control
(all suggested by Davide)
RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/20240611235355.177667-1-ast@fiberby.net/
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen (13):
net/sched: flower: refactor control flag definitions
doc: netlink: specs: tc: describe flower control flags
net/sched: flower: define new tunnel flags
net/sched: cls_flower: prepare fl_{set,dump}_key_flags() for ENC_FLAGS
net/sched: cls_flower: add policy for TCA_FLOWER_KEY_FLAGS
flow_dissector: prepare for encapsulated control flags
flow_dissector: set encapsulated control flags from tun_flags
net/sched: cls_flower: add tunnel flags to fl_{set,dump}_key_flags()
net/sched: cls_flower: rework TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ENC_FLAGS usage
doc: netlink: specs: tc: flower: add enc-flags
flow_dissector: cleanup FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_FLAGS
flow_dissector: set encapsulation control flags for non-IP
net/sched: cls_flower: propagate tca[TCA_OPTIONS] to NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK
Documentation/netlink/specs/tc.yaml | 26 +++++
include/net/flow_dissector.h | 30 ++---
include/net/ip_tunnels.h | 12 --
include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h | 11 +-
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 50 +++++----
net/sched/cls_flower.c | 168 ++++++++++++++++------------
6 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists