[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpNavC6aidKQCbKb@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 06:57:32 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
Hello Paul,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 08:16:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > >
> > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > >
> > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> >
> > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> >
> > make run:
> > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> >
> > make run-user:
> > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> >
> > So looks good to me!
>
> And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> any needed adjustments.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
>
> nolibc updates for v6.11
>
> o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
>
> o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
>
> o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
^^
s/us/use
> o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
>
> o Implement strtol() and friends.
>
> o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> non-nolibc libraries.
>
> o Implement strerror().
>
> o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> against non-nolibc libraries.
All of this looks good to me.
Thank you!
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists