[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240714051427.114044-2-bottaawesome633@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 08:14:27 +0300
From: botta633 <bottaawesome633@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
syzbot+7f4a6f7f7051474e40ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Testing lock class and subclass got the same name pointer
Checking if the lockdep_map->name will change when setting the subclass.
It shouldn't change so that the lock class and subclass will have the same name
Reported-by: <syzbot+7f4a6f7f7051474e40ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: fd5e3f5fe27
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: botta633 <bottaawesome633@...il.com>
---
lib/locking-selftest.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index 6f6a5fc85b42..1d7885205f36 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -2710,12 +2710,24 @@ static void local_lock_3B(void)
}
+static void class_subclass_X1_name(void)
+{
+ const char *name_before_subclass = rwsem_X1.dep_map.name;
+ const char *name_after_subclass;
+
+ WARN_ON(!rwsem_X1.dep_map.name);
+ lockdep_set_subclass(&rwsem_X1, 1);
+ WARN_ON(name_before_subclass != name_after_subclass);
+}
+
static void local_lock_tests(void)
{
printk(" --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
printk(" | local_lock tests |\n");
printk(" ---------------------\n");
+ init_class_X(&lock_X1, &rwlock_X1, &mutex_X1, &rwsem_X1);
+
print_testname("local_lock inversion 2");
dotest(local_lock_2, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_LL);
pr_cont("\n");
@@ -2727,6 +2739,10 @@ static void local_lock_tests(void)
print_testname("local_lock inversion 3B");
dotest(local_lock_3B, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_LL);
pr_cont("\n");
+
+ print_testname("Class and subclass");
+ dotest(class_subclass_X1_name, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
+ pr_cont("\n");
}
static void hardirq_deadlock_softirq_not_deadlock(void)
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists