[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240714225315.f56498a2d4e924fd07633c78@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:53:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Miaohe Lin
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm-stable tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:42:39 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mm-stable tree got a conflict in:
>
> mm/hugetlb.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 5596d9e8b553 ("mm/hugetlb: fix potential race in __update_and_free_hugetlb_folio()")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> a81fa1dc5db2 ("mm/hugetlb: fix potential race with try_memory_failure_hugetlb()")
>
> from the mm-stable tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks. This caused me grief.
I removed a81fa1dc5db2 ("mm/hugetlb: fix potential race with
try_memory_failure_hugetlb()") from mm-stable and redid it against
mm-unstable. It still has cc:stable so some merging work will be
needed when the stable tree maintainers get onto it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists