[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240715-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v1-6-46b2984c2205@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:29:32 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 6/6] kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu()
Add a test that will create cache, allocate one object, kfree_rcu() it
and attempt to destroy it. If the asynchronous cache freeing works
correctly, there should be no warnings in dmesg.
Since the warnings in the failure case are produced by a work callback,
I don't know if it's possible to capture it in the kunit test result
properly.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
lib/slub_kunit.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/slub_kunit.c b/lib/slub_kunit.c
index e6667a28c014..e3e4d0ca40b7 100644
--- a/lib/slub_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/slub_kunit.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include "../mm/slab.h"
static struct kunit_resource resource;
@@ -157,6 +158,26 @@ static void test_kmalloc_redzone_access(struct kunit *test)
kmem_cache_destroy(s);
}
+struct test_kfree_rcu_struct {
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+};
+
+static void test_kfree_rcu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kmem_cache *s = test_kmem_cache_create("TestSlub_kfree_rcu",
+ sizeof(struct test_kfree_rcu_struct),
+ SLAB_NO_MERGE);
+ struct test_kfree_rcu_struct *p = kmem_cache_alloc(s, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ kasan_disable_current();
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, slab_errors);
+
+ kasan_enable_current();
+ kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
+ kmem_cache_destroy(s);
+}
+
static int test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
slab_errors = 0;
@@ -177,6 +198,7 @@ static struct kunit_case test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(test_clobber_redzone_free),
KUNIT_CASE(test_kmalloc_redzone_access),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_kfree_rcu),
{}
};
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists