[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6c92c73-13fb-8e9c-29de-1437654c3880@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:52:30 -0700
From: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "Saravana
Kannan" <saravanak@...gle.com>, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@...il.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.ibm.com>, Kowshik Jois B S
<kowsjois@...ux.ibm.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Fix crash during pci_dev hot-unplug on pseries
KVM guest
On 7/15/24 11:55, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 2:08 AM Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> With CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES [1], a hot-plug and hot-unplug sequence
>> of a PCI device attached to a PCI-bridge causes following kernel Oops on
>> a pseries KVM guest:
>>
>> RTAS: event: 2, Type: Hotplug Event (229), Severity: 1
>> Kernel attempted to read user page (10ec00000048) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
>> BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x10ec00000048
>> Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000012d8728
>> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>> LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
>> <snip>
>> NIP [c0000000012d8728] __of_changeset_entry_invert+0x10/0x1ac
>> LR [c0000000012da7f0] __of_changeset_revert_entries+0x98/0x180
>> Call Trace:
>> [c00000000bcc3970] [c0000000012daa60] of_changeset_revert+0x58/0xd8
>> [c00000000bcc39c0] [c000000000d0ed78] of_pci_remove_node+0x74/0xb0
>> [c00000000bcc39f0] [c000000000cdcfe0] pci_stop_bus_device+0xf4/0x138
>> [c00000000bcc3a30] [c000000000cdd140] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked+0x34/0x64
>> [c00000000bcc3a60] [c000000000cf3780] remove_store+0xf0/0x108
>> [c00000000bcc3ab0] [c000000000e89e04] dev_attr_store+0x34/0x78
>> [c00000000bcc3ad0] [c0000000007f8dd4] sysfs_kf_write+0x70/0xa4
>> [c00000000bcc3af0] [c0000000007f7248] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1d0/0x2e0
>> [c00000000bcc3b40] [c0000000006c9b08] vfs_write+0x27c/0x558
>> [c00000000bcc3bf0] [c0000000006ca168] ksys_write+0x90/0x170
>> [c00000000bcc3c40] [c000000000033248] system_call_exception+0xf8/0x290
>> [c00000000bcc3e50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
>> <snip>
>>
>> A git bisect pointed this regression to be introduced via [1] that added
>> a mechanism to create device tree nodes for parent PCI bridges when a
>> PCI device is hot-plugged.
>>
>> The Oops is caused when `pci_stop_dev()` tries to remove a non-existing
>> device-tree node associated with the pci_dev that was earlier
>> hot-plugged and was attached under a pci-bridge. The PCI dev header
>> `dev->hdr_type` being 0, results a conditional check done with
>> `pci_is_bridge()` into false. Consequently, a call to
>> `of_pci_make_dev_node()` to create a device node is never made. When at
>> a later point in time, in the device node removal path, a memcpy is
>> attempted in `__of_changeset_entry_invert()`; since the device node was
>> never created, results in an Oops due to kernel read access to a bad
>> address.
>>
>> To fix this issue, the patch updates `of_changeset_create_node()` to
>> allocate a new node only when the device node doesn't exist and init it
>> in case it does already. Also, introduce `of_pci_free_node()` to be
>> called to only revert and destroy the changeset device node that was
>> created via a call to `of_changeset_create_node()`.
>>
>> [1] commit 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
>>
>> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
>> Reported-by: Kowshik Jois B S <kowsjois@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> * Included Lizhi's suggested changes on V1
>> * Fixed below two warnings from Lizhi's changes and rearranged the cleanup
>> part a bit in `of_pci_make_dev_node`
>> drivers/pci/of.c:611:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘of_pci_free_node’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> 611 | void of_pci_free_node(struct device_node *np)
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/pci/of.c: In function ‘of_pci_make_dev_node’:
>> drivers/pci/of.c:696:1: warning: label ‘out_destroy_cset’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
>> 696 | out_destroy_cset:
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> * V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240703141634.2974589-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
>>
>> drivers/of/dynamic.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>> drivers/of/unittest.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/pci/bus.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/pci/of.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 ++
>> include/linux/of.h | 1 +
>> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
>> index dda6092e6d3a..9bba5e82a384 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
>> @@ -492,21 +492,29 @@ struct device_node *__of_node_dup(const struct device_node *np,
>> * a given changeset.
>> *
>> * @ocs: Pointer to changeset
>> + * @np: Pointer to device node. If null, allocate a new node. If not, init an
>> + * existing one.
>> * @parent: Pointer to parent device node
>> * @full_name: Node full name
>> *
>> * Return: Pointer to the created device node or NULL in case of an error.
>> */
>> struct device_node *of_changeset_create_node(struct of_changeset *ocs,
>> + struct device_node *np,
>> struct device_node *parent,
>> const char *full_name)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *np;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - np = __of_node_dup(NULL, full_name);
>> - if (!np)
>> - return NULL;
>> + if (!np) {
>> + np = __of_node_dup(NULL, full_name);
>> + if (!np)
>> + return NULL;
>> + } else {
>> + of_node_set_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC);
>> + of_node_set_flag(np, OF_DETACHED);
> Are we going to rename the function to
> of_changeset_create_or_maybe_modify_node()? No. The functions here are
> very clear in that they allocate new objects and don't reuse what's
> passed in.
Ok. How about keeping of_changeset_create_node unchanged.
Instead, call kzalloc(), of_node_init() and of_changeset_attach_node()
in of_pci_make_dev_node() directly.
A similar example is dlpar_parse_cc_node().
Does this sound better?
Thanks,
Lizhi
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists