[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67b6fc09-7edc-4fae-859a-dc386d4deada@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:08:33 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>, Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] PCI: brcmstb: Don't conflate the reset rescal
with phy ctrl
On 7/10/24 15:16, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> We've been assuming that if an SOC has a "rescal" reset controller that we
> should automatically invoke brcm_phy_cntl(...). This will not be true in
> future SOCs, so we create a bool "has_phy" and adjust the cfg_data
> appropriately (we need to give 7216 its own cfg_data structure instead of
> sharing one).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists