[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28bd11d3-2487-4dd4-ac44-896f972f7e97@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:44:16 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: alice.guo@....com, festevam@...il.com, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
ye.li@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into
struct imx_wdt_hw_feature
On 7/15/24 10:07, Frank Li wrote:
> Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simplify code logic
> for different compatible strings
>
> i.MX93 and i.MX8ULP watchdog do not need to wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is
> done. Set post_rcs_wait to false explicitly to maintain code consistency.
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <ye.li@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Being more explicit here, to make sure this isn't picked up with my
Reviewed-by: tag:
NACK for the explicit and unnecessary additional initializations.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists