lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALm+0cUEqgDY_-4OjNYrWhzgP1YB79pP3SdjN2wgoMs65QwP6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:09:47 +0800
From: Z qiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, 
	joel@...lfernandes.org, urezki@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp
 variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()

>
> For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is
> defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this
> will cause the following system panic:
>
> smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> ...
> setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1
> ...
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8
> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W
> 6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6
> RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082
> CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __die+0x23/0x80
> ? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180
> ? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180
> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40
> ? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> ? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40
> rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180
> rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0
> kthread+0xe8/0x140
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80
> </TASK>
>
> Considering that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, use the
> maximum possible cpu number, instead of nr_cpu_ids, for configuring
> enqueue and dequeue limits.
>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
> Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index 2b1d6abf3ba3..12d63ce84cc9 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
>         struct list_head rtp_blkd_tasks;
>         struct list_head rtp_exit_list;
>         int cpu;
> +       int index;
>         struct rcu_tasks *rtpp;
>  };
>
> @@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
>         call_rcu_func_t call_func;
>         unsigned int wait_state;
>         struct rcu_tasks_percpu __percpu *rtpcpu;
> +       struct rcu_tasks_percpu **rtpcp_array;
>         int percpu_enqueue_shift;
>         int percpu_enqueue_lim;
>         int percpu_dequeue_lim;
> @@ -182,6 +184,8 @@ module_param(rcu_task_collapse_lim, int, 0444);
>  static int rcu_task_lazy_lim __read_mostly = 32;
>  module_param(rcu_task_lazy_lim, int, 0444);
>
> +static int rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> +
>  /* RCU tasks grace-period state for debugging. */
>  #define RTGS_INIT               0
>  #define RTGS_WAIT_WAIT_CBS      1
> @@ -245,6 +249,8 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>         int cpu;
>         int lim;
>         int shift;
> +       int maxcpu;
> +       int index = 0;
>
>         if (rcu_task_enqueue_lim < 0) {
>                 rcu_task_enqueue_lim = 1;
> @@ -254,14 +260,9 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>         }
>         lim = rcu_task_enqueue_lim;
>
> -       if (lim > nr_cpu_ids)
> -               lim = nr_cpu_ids;
> -       shift = ilog2(nr_cpu_ids / lim);
> -       if (((nr_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> -               shift++;
> -       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> -       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> -       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> +       rtp->rtpcp_array = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(struct rcu_tasks_percpu *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       BUG_ON(!rtp->rtpcp_array);
> +
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>                 struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
> @@ -273,14 +274,29 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>                 INIT_WORK(&rtpcp->rtp_work, rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs_wq);
>                 rtpcp->cpu = cpu;
>                 rtpcp->rtpp = rtp;
> +               rtpcp->index = index;
> +               rtp->rtpcp_array[index] = rtpcp;
> +               index++;
>                 if (!rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks.next)
>                         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks);
>                 if (!rtpcp->rtp_exit_list.next)
>                         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
> +               maxcpu = cpu;
>         }
>
> -       pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d.\n", rtp->name,
> -                       data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim), rcu_task_cb_adjust);
> +       rcu_task_cpu_ids = maxcpu + 1;
> +       if (lim > rcu_task_cpu_ids)
> +               lim = rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> +       shift = ilog2(rcu_task_cpu_ids / lim);
> +       if (((rcu_task_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> +               shift++;
> +       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> +       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> +       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);

It seems that smp_store_release does not need,  the
WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim)
is enough, cblist_init_generic() is invoke in early boot, at this
time,  no other tasks access these
percpu_*lim.

Thanks
Zqiang


> +
> +       pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d rcu_task_cpu_ids=%d.\n",
> +                       rtp->name, data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim),
> +                       rcu_task_cb_adjust, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
>  }
>
>  // Compute wakeup time for lazy callback timer.
> @@ -348,7 +364,7 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
>                         rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries = 0;
>                 }
>                 if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ++rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries > rcu_task_contend_lim &&
> -                   READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != nr_cpu_ids)
> +                   READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != rcu_task_cpu_ids)
>                         needadjust = true;  // Defer adjustment to avoid deadlock.
>         }
>         // Queuing callbacks before initialization not yet supported.
> @@ -368,10 +384,10 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
>         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
>         if (unlikely(needadjust)) {
>                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> -               if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != nr_cpu_ids) {
> +               if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != rcu_task_cpu_ids) {
>                         WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, 0);
> -                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> -                       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> +                       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
>                         pr_info("Switching %s to per-CPU callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
>                 }
>                 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> @@ -444,6 +460,8 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>
>         dequeue_limit = smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim);
>         for (cpu = 0; cpu < dequeue_limit; cpu++) {
> +               if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
> +                       continue;
>                 struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
>                 /* Advance and accelerate any new callbacks. */
> @@ -481,7 +499,7 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>         if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ncbs <= rcu_task_collapse_lim) {
>                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
>                 if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim > 1) {
> -                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(nr_cpu_ids));
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(rcu_task_cpu_ids));
>                         smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, 1);
>                         rtp->percpu_dequeue_gpseq = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
>                         gpdone = false;
> @@ -496,7 +514,9 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>                         pr_info("Completing switch %s to CPU-0 callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
>                 }
>                 if (rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim == 1) {
> -                       for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> +                       for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < rcu_task_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> +                               if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
> +                                       continue;
>                                 struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
>                                 WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rtpcp->cblist));
> @@ -511,30 +531,32 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>  // Advance callbacks and invoke any that are ready.
>  static void rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp)
>  {
> -       int cpu;
> -       int cpunext;
>         int cpuwq;
>         unsigned long flags;
>         int len;
> +       int index;
>         struct rcu_head *rhp;
>         struct rcu_cblist rcl = RCU_CBLIST_INITIALIZER(rcl);
>         struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp_next;
>
> -       cpu = rtpcp->cpu;
> -       cpunext = cpu * 2 + 1;
> -       if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> -               rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> -               cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> -               queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> -               cpunext++;
> -               if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> -                       rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> -                       cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> +       index = rtpcp->index * 2 + 1;
> +       if (index < num_possible_cpus()) {
> +               rtpcp_next = rtp->rtpcp_array[index];
> +               if (rtpcp_next->cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> +                       cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(rtpcp_next->cpu) ? rtpcp_next->cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
>                         queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> +                       index++;
> +                       if (index < num_possible_cpus()) {
> +                               rtpcp_next = rtp->rtpcp_array[index];
> +                               if (rtpcp_next->cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> +                                       cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(rtpcp_next->cpu) ? rtpcp_next->cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> +                                       queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> +                               }
> +                       }
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) || !cpu_possible(cpu))
> +       if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist))
>                 return;
>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
>         rcu_segcblist_advance(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ