lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D2Q2Q4R8BZ4Q.2QZF7NM3RE9B8@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:25:15 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Hao Ge" <hao.ge@...ux.dev>, <peterhuewe@....de>, <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Hao
 Ge" <gehao@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Move dereference after NULL check in
 tpm_buf_check_hmac_response

On Tue Jul 9, 2024 at 5:33 AM EEST, Hao Ge wrote:
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
>
> We shouldn't dereference "auth" until after we have checked that it is
> non-NULL.
>
> Fixes: 7ca110f2679b ("tpm: Address !chip->auth in tpm_buf_append_hmac_session*()")
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>

Also lacking:

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/3b1755a9-b12f-42fc-b26d-de2fe4e13ec2@stanley.mountain/T/#u

What is happening here is that my commit exposed pre-existing bug to
static analysis but it did not introduce a new regression. I missed
from your patch how did you ended up to your conclusions.

Please *do not* ignore the sources next time. Either explain how the bug
was found or provide the reporting source. You are essentially taking
credit and also blame from the work that you did not accomplish
yourself, which is both wrong and dishonest.

BR, Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ