[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172104963892.2215.4356155837871772907.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:20:38 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nianyao Tang <tangnianyao@...wei.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/gic-v4: Make sure a VPE is locked when VMAPP
is issued
The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: a84a07fa3100d7ad46a3d6882af25a3df9c9e7e3
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a84a07fa3100d7ad46a3d6882af25a3df9c9e7e3
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 10:31:55 +01:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:13:55 +02:00
irqchip/gic-v4: Make sure a VPE is locked when VMAPP is issued
In order to make sure that vpe->col_idx is correctly sampled when a VMAPP
command is issued, the vpe_lock must be held for the VPE. This is now
possible since the introduction of the per-VM vmapp_lock, which can be
taken before vpe_lock in the correct locking order.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Nianyao Tang <tangnianyao@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240705093155.871070-4-maz@kernel.org
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index 215c7ab..c23a64f 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -1810,7 +1810,9 @@ static void its_map_vm(struct its_node *its, struct its_vm *vm)
for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
struct its_vpe *vpe = vm->vpes[i];
- its_send_vmapp(its, vpe, true);
+ scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &vpe->vpe_lock)
+ its_send_vmapp(its, vpe, true);
+
its_send_vinvall(its, vpe);
}
}
@@ -1827,8 +1829,10 @@ static void its_unmap_vm(struct its_node *its, struct its_vm *vm)
if (!--vm->vlpi_count[its->list_nr]) {
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_vpes; i++) {
+ guard(raw_spinlock)(&vm->vpes[i]->vpe_lock);
its_send_vmapp(its, vm->vpes[i], false);
+ }
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists