linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] x86/bugs: Add a separate config for GDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZpUlmf/iVgo78h4J@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:35:21 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] x86/bugs: Add a separate config for GDS

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:14:54AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Sure, I will send a v4 and get rid of GDS_FORCE_MITIGATION completely.
> 
> I'm actually waiting on the people on Cc to chime in whether we really need
> it. The three distro configs we checked, don't set it.

Makes sense, thanks.

Regarding this patchset itself, what is the patch forward?

Should I send a rebased version?

Thanks
--breno