[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpVPBEq/ZHv9r5YW@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:32:04 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>
Cc: o.rempel@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, andi.shyti@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, francesco.dolcini@...adex.com,
joao.goncalves@...adex.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] i2c: imx: only poll for bus busy in multi master
mode
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:17:51PM +0200, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
>
> According to the reference manual it is only necessary to poll for bus
I supposed it should be "According to i2c spec",
> busy and arbitration lost in multi master mode. This helps to avoid
> rescheduling while the i2c bus is busy and avoids SMBus devices to
> timeout.
>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index 3842e527116b7..1add946e3bc20 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ struct imx_i2c_struct {
> struct i2c_client *slave;
> enum i2c_slave_event last_slave_event;
>
> + bool multi_master;
> +
> /* For checking slave events. */
> spinlock_t slave_lock;
> struct hrtimer slave_timer;
> @@ -481,6 +483,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_bus_busy(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, int for_busy, bool a
> unsigned long orig_jiffies = jiffies;
> unsigned int temp;
>
> + if (!i2c_imx->multi_master)
> + return 0;
> +
> while (1) {
> temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
>
> @@ -540,8 +545,8 @@ static int i2c_imx_trx_complete(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, bool atomic)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> - /* check for arbitration lost */
> - if (i2c_imx->i2csr & I2SR_IAL) {
> + /* In multi-master mode check for arbitration lost */
> + if (i2c_imx->multi_master && (i2c_imx->i2csr & I2SR_IAL)) {
> dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev, "<%s> Arbitration lost\n", __func__);
> i2c_imx_clear_irq(i2c_imx, I2SR_IAL);
>
> @@ -1468,6 +1473,8 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto rpm_disable;
> }
>
> + i2c_imx->multi_master = of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "multi-master");
> +
> /* Set up clock divider */
> i2c_imx->bitrate = I2C_MAX_STANDARD_MODE_FREQ;
> ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists