[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac6de49a-a130-41eb-87b5-0ecd1e05840b@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:32:38 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-mdev: add MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
On 7/15/2024 9:35 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:17:41 -0700
> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/12/2024 3:36 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:>>>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>>>>> MODULE_INFO(supported, "Test driver that simulate serial port over PCI");
>>>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test driver that simulate serial port over PCI");
>>>
>>> Seems the preceding MODULE_INFO needs to be removed here. At best the
>>> added MODULE_DESCRIPTION is redundant, but "supported" is not a
>>> standard tag, so it's not clear what the purpose of that tag was meant
>>> to be anyway. Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>
>> My preference would be to just add the missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() with this
>> patch since that fixes the existing warning. Removing an existing macro
>> invocation is out of scope for what I'm trying to accomplish.
>
> This adds a MODULE_DESCRIPTION that's redundant to the current
> MODULE_INFO, therefore I'd argue that it's not out of scope to replace
> the MODULE_INFO with a MODULE_DESCRIPTION to achieve your goal. Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
ok, let me post a v2
/jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists